[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0000013f5ccd9d66-616fef8f-7cf1-45ec-bd20-b1fed9264cbe-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:19:06 +0000
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Li Zhong <zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
Mats Liljegren <liljegren.mats2@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Full dynticks selftests 0.0.1
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> +online to handle timekeeping tasks in order to ensure that system
> +calls like gettimeofday() returns accurate values on adaptive-tick CPUs.
> +(This is not an issue for CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE=y because there are no running
> +user processes to observe slight drifts in clock rate.) Therefore, the
> +boot CPU is prohibited from entering adaptive-ticks mode. Specifying a
> +"nohz_full=" mask that includes the boot CPU will result in a boot-time
> +error message, and the boot CPU will be removed from the mask. Note that
> +this means that your system must have at least two CPUs in order for
> +CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y to do anything for you.
These are some important point here. Very good. Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists