[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51C1C3E6.8090000@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:44:54 -0400
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC: <rjw@...k.pl>, <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
<patches@...aro.org>, <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<robin.randhawa@....com>, <Steve.Bannister@....com>,
<Liviu.Dudau@....com>, <charles.garcia-tobin@....com>,
<arvind.chauhan@....com>, <dave.martin@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/13] cpufreq: omap: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier
in error cases
On Wednesday 19 June 2013 04:53 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> PRECHANGE and POSTCHANGE notifiers must be called in groups, i.e either both
> should be called or both shouldn't be.
>
> In case we have started PRECHANGE notifier and found an error, we must call
> POSTCHANGE notifier with freqs.new = freqs.old to guarantee that sequence of
> calling notifiers is complete.
>
> Omap driver was taking care of it well, but wasn't restoring freqs.new to
> freqs.old in some cases. I wasn't required to add code for it as moving
> PRECHANGE notifier down was a better option, so that we call it just before
> starting frequency transition.
>
> Cca: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> ---
Looks safe to me.
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists