[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AE90C24D6B3A694183C094C60CF0A2F6026B729A@saturn3.aculab.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:06:21 +0100
From: "David Laight" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: "Eric Dumazet" <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: "Jason Wang" <jasowang@...hat.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <hkchu@...gle.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [net-next rfc 1/3] net: avoid high order memory allocation for queues by using flex array
> +static void netif_free_tx_queues(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + if (is_vmalloc_addr(dev->_tx))
> + vfree(dev->_tx);
> + else
> + kfree(dev->_tx);
> +}
> +
> static int netif_alloc_netdev_queues(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> unsigned int count = dev->num_tx_queues;
> @@ -5261,9 +5270,11 @@ static int netif_alloc_netdev_queues(struct net_device *dev)
> BUG_ON(count < 1);
>
> tx = kcalloc(count, sizeof(struct netdev_queue), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!tx)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> + if (!tx) {
> + tx = vzalloc(count * sizeof(struct netdev_queue));
> + if (!tx)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> dev->_tx = tx;
Given the number of places I've seen this code added, why
not put it in a general helper?
I also thought that malloc() with GFP_KERNEL would sleep.
Under what conditions does it fail instead?
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists