[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130619165259.GA16002@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:52:59 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com>
Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@...hat.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ptrace: make PTRACE_DETACH work on non-stopped tracees.
On 06/19, Pedro Alves wrote:
>
> On 06/19/2013 05:09 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:15:36 +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> >> CCing Jan to hear his comments from gdb side.
>
> PTRACE_DETACH takes a signal number in the data parameter.
> What happens to if the tracer passes a non-zero signal?
non-zero doesn't matter, zero is equally bad.
ptrace_detach() simply does child->exit_code = data, assuming
that child will look at it after resume. This is just wrong if
the child is not stopped.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists