lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:21:41 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
	Russ Anderson <rja@....com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	Arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v11 resend 10/11] arm, change reboot_mode to use enum
 reboot_mode

On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:52:02 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:

> On Wednesday 19 June 2013 12:58:10 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Thursday 06 June 2013 06:47:23 Robin Holt wrote:
> > > Preparing to move the parsing of reboot= to generic kernel code
> > > forces the change in reboot_mode handling to use the enum.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
> > > To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> > > Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
> > > Cc: Russ Anderson <rja@....com>
> > > Cc: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
> > > Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
> > > Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>
> > > Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
> > > Cc: the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
> > > Cc: Arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
> > > Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
> > 
> > Should we merge this through the arm-soc tree?
> > 
> > I'm getting a few conflicts with new platforms getting added
> > using the old interface.
> 
> Hmm, I realized after sending it that this patch depends on
> at least one other patch to add the 'enum'. Any suggestions
> for how to handle that?

This patchset gets a lot of rejects which I keep on fixing up.  Please
merge up early in the merge window and compile-test (and review) the
linux-next changes to make sure I didn't muck up the reject-fixing,
then we should be fine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ