linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] Extend multi_v7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201306192046.41005.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:46:40 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
Cc:	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Josh Cartwright <josh.cartwright@...com>,
	Tony Prisk <linux@...sktech.co.nz>,
	Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] Extend multi_v7_defconfig

On Wednesday 19 June 2013, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
> I don't know how much a defconfig is supposed to provide, hence as RFC.
> This patches are needed for booting Zynq into a minimum ramfs based
> system with a serial console.

In my opinion we should provide enable all the platform specific drivers
in the defconfigs, as well as everything needed to boot the system,
to get proper compile coverage as well as the ability to test changes
easily. Your patches look good. Michal, would you apply them and
send another pull request or should I just take them directly?

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/