linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] ARM: s3c64xx: Let amba-pl08x driver handle DMA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130619192449.GI1403@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:24:49 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>, Dan Williams <djbw@...com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...dd.com>,
	Giancarlo Asnaghi <giancarlo.asnaghi@...com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@...sung.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
	Padmavathi Venna <padma.v@...sung.com>,
	Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@...il.com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Alban Bedel <alban.bedel@...onic-design.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] ARM: s3c64xx: Let amba-pl08x driver handle DMA

On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 09:01:33PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 June 2013, Tomasz Figa wrote:

> > >       if (plchan->mux_use++ == 0 && pd->get_signal) {
> > > -             ret = pd->get_signal(plchan->cd);
> > > +             ret = (pd->get_signal)(plchan->cd);

> > Hmm, that's strange. The former is a completely valid piece of code...

> get_signal is a macro defined in include/linux/signal.h. If that header
> gets included, neither of the two is valid.

Ah, that'll be it.  I'll post a patch to rename...

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)