[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130619201054.GA20996@jonmason-lab>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:10:54 -0700
From: Jon Mason <jon.mason@...el.com>
To: Dan Williams <djbw@...com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ioatdma: add DMA_PRIVATE capabilities flag
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:56:38AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Jon Mason <jon.mason@...el.com> wrote:
> >> DMA_PRIVATE here keeps all channels private, so they couldn't be used
> >> elsewhere, for example raid offload. Do you need a private allocation
> >> or can you get away with a dynamically assigned channel?
> >
> > I would like to have a dedicated DMA engine. async_tx could cause the
> > copies to complete out of order. Do I need to add infrastructure to
> > allow for private channel usage, and when unused allow the channel to
> > be used by async_tx?
>
> Can NTB just call dma_find_channel() once and be done? Also, async_tx
> will only get things out of order if you allow it to pick a new
> channel for every operation, but as long as you specify a dependency
> chain it will keep things in order (same as remembering the result of
> dma_find_channel).
Neither of these allow a device exclusive access to a channel. Is
this not something that is desired by other users of DMA Engines, or
do I have a unique usage model?
Thanks,
Jon
>
> --
> Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists