[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2925371.ZJMOdCiC6f@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:49:09 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Xiaoguang Chen <chenxg.marvell@...il.com>,
Xiaoguang Chen <chenxg@...vell.com>, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
njiang1@...vell.com, zjwu@...vell.com, ylmao@...vell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] cpufreq: fix governor start/stop race condition
On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 08:30:11 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 19 June 2013 06:50, Xiaoguang Chen <chenxg.marvell@...il.com> wrote:
> > 2013/6/19 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>:
> >> On Thursday, June 13, 2013 05:01:58 PM Xiaoguang Chen wrote:
> >>> cpufreq governor stop and start should be kept in sequence.
> >>> If not, there will be unexpected behavior, for example:
> >>>
> >>> we have 4 cpus and policy->cpu=cpu0, cpu1/2/3 are linked to cpu0.
> >>
> >> Please spell cpus as "CPUs". And please start sequences from capitals.
> >
> > Ok, thanks for the remind
> >
> >>
> >> [Yes, it *really* is a problem.]
>
> Just wanted to know the reasoning behind it so that I can remind
> others about it and then argue :)
Well, sentences that don't start from upper-case letters don't look like
separate sentences and when I see "cpus" written like this I tend to read
it as "cups" with a typo.
Generally speaking, don't make changelogs harder to read than they have to be.
They usually are hard enough to read anyway.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists