linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mce: acpi/apei: Add a boot option to disable ff mode for corrected errors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 20 Jun 2013 07:35:10 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc:	"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"ananth@...ibm.com" <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	"masbock@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <masbock@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"lcm@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <lcm@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
	Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mce: acpi/apei: Add a boot option to disable ff
 mode for corrected errors

On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:08:53PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > The above question about what to do *without* going to userspace and
> > back is maybe more interesting and we'd need a clean design there...
> > we'll see.
> 
> Yes - this case (where the BIOS did all the threshold math and made the decision)
> should be one where Linux kernel could just implement the action directly.
> Perhaps controlled by a knob to say whether we really trust the BIOS that much.
> 
> But we will also have cases where a smart user agent can correlate data
> from multiple sources to identify the real root cause (e.g. some temperature
> anomalies around the same time as some memory errors that occur at 10am
> on the third Tuesday each month -> cause is air conditioner maintenance guy
> that shuts down the a/c for 10 minutes to change the filter).

Surely we cannot put that in the kernel. For that we'd need userspace to
decide and only turn knobs in the kernel.

> I'll leave writing an agent that smart as an exercise for the concerned data
> center manager :-)

Me too, as long as it stays in userspace and it only turns
knobs/interfaces in the kernel.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/