linux-kernel - Re: [net-next rfc 1/3] net: avoid high order memory allocation for queues by using flex array

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1371708312.3252.359.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:05:12 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com, hkchu@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next rfc 1/3] net: avoid high order memory allocation for
 queues by using flex array

On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 13:14 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:

> A drawback of NETIF_F_LLTX is that we may contend on qdisc lock
> especially when we have a huge number of tx queues.

For your information loopback driver is LLTX, and there is no qdisc on
it, unless you specifically add one.

Once you add a qdisc on a device, you hit the typical contention on a
spinlock. But its hard to design a parallel qdisc. So far nobody did
that.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/