linux-kernel - [PATCH v3] perf: fix bench numa compilation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1371713985-1694-1-git-send-email-riccardo.magliocchetti@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:39:45 +0200
From:	Riccardo Magliocchetti <riccardo.magliocchetti@...il.com>
To:	acme@...stprotocols.net
Cc:	namhyung@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Riccardo Magliocchetti <riccardo.magliocchetti@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] perf: fix bench numa compilation

Fix the following errors on gcc 4.8.1 / x86:

bench/numa.c: In function ‘worker_thread’:
bench/numa.c:1113:20: error: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Werror=sign-compare]
    if (diff.tv_sec >= g->p.nr_secs) {
                    ^
bench/numa.c:1161:6: error: format ‘%lx’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 5 has type ‘u64’ [-Werror=format=]
      process_nr, thread_nr, runtime_ns_max / bytes_done, val);
      ^

Signed-off-by: Riccardo Magliocchetti <riccardo.magliocchetti@...il.com>
---
 tools/perf/bench/numa.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Changes since v2:
- use PRIu64 as suggested by Arnaldo Carvalho da Melo

diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
index 30d1c32..f5c0834 100644
--- a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
+++ b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 #include <string.h>
 #include <unistd.h>
 #include <pthread.h>
+#include <inttypes.h>
 #include <sys/mman.h>
 #include <sys/time.h>
 #include <sys/wait.h>
@@ -1110,7 +1111,7 @@ static void *worker_thread(void *__tdata)
 		/* Check whether our max runtime timed out: */
 		if (g->p.nr_secs) {
 			timersub(&stop, &start0, &diff);
-			if (diff.tv_sec >= g->p.nr_secs) {
+			if (diff.tv_sec >= (long int)g->p.nr_secs) {
 				g->stop_work = true;
 				break;
 			}
@@ -1157,7 +1158,7 @@ static void *worker_thread(void *__tdata)
 			runtime_ns_max += diff.tv_usec * 1000;
 
 			if (details >= 0) {
-				printf(" #%2d / %2d: %14.2lf nsecs/op [val: %016lx]\n",
+				printf(" #%2d / %2d: %14.2lf nsecs/op [val: %016"PRIu64"x]\n",
 					process_nr, thread_nr, runtime_ns_max / bytes_done, val);
 			}
 			fflush(stdout);
-- 
1.8.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/