[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130620090728.GA2842@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:07:29 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Jed Davis <jld@...illa.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: ARM: Record the user-mode PC in the call chain.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 04:17:06AM +0100, Jed Davis wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 02:13:19PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:21:11AM +0100, Jed Davis wrote:
> > > With this change, we no longer lose the innermost entry in the user-mode
> > > part of the call chain. See also the x86 port, which includes the ip.
> > >
> > > It's possible to partially work around this problem by post-processing
> > > the data to use the PERF_SAMPLE_IP value, but this works only if the CPU
> > > wasn't in the kernel when the sample was taken.
> >
> > Thanks. I guess we need something similar for arm64 too. Could you cook a
> > similar patch please?
>
> Done (and tested, on the ARM V8 Foundation Model).
Wow, I didn't expect you to test it. Thanks!
> It looked as if the powerpc and sparc ports might have similar issues,
> but I haven't checked on them yet.
I can extract some hardware from the pile in the corner of my flat if you
want a hand with testing.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists