[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DC88CAD03C0052499C1907B327FC63229ECDCE@DBDE04.ent.ti.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:13:06 +0000
From: "J, KEERTHY" <j-keerthy@...com>
To: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"ldewangan@...dia.com" <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
"grant.likely@...retlab.ca" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
"swarren@...dia.com" <swarren@...dia.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"gg@...mlogic.co.uk" <gg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 2/4] MFD: Palmas: Add SMPS10_BOOST feature
Hi Samuel,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Samuel Ortiz [mailto:sameo@...ux.intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 2:38 PM
> To: J, KEERTHY
> Cc: broonie@...nel.org; ldewangan@...dia.com;
> grant.likely@...retlab.ca; swarren@...dia.com; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-doc@...r.kernel.org; devicetree-
> discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org; gg@...mlogic.co.uk; linux-
> omap@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] MFD: Palmas: Add SMPS10_BOOST feature
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 04:34:42AM +0000, J, KEERTHY wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: J, KEERTHY
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 11:28 AM
> > > To: linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
> > > Cc: broonie@...nel.org; J, KEERTHY; ldewangan@...dia.com;
> > > sameo@...ux.intel.com; grant.likely@...retlab.ca;
> > > swarren@...dia.com; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> > > linux-doc@...r.kernel.org; devicetree- discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org;
> > > gg@...mlogic.co.uk
> > > Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] MFD: Palmas: Add SMPS10_BOOST feature
> > >
> > > From: J Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
> > >
> > > The SMPS10 regulator is not presesnt in all the variants of the
> > > PALMAS PMIC family. Hence adding a feature to distingush between
> them.
> > >
> >
> > Could you please pull this patch?
> I'm reverting this one for now as of_match_device is not define for
> !CONFIG_OF.
So the of_match_device parts can come under #ifdef CONFIG_OF?
>
> Cheers,
> Samuel.
>
> --
> Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> http://oss.intel.com/
Regards,
Keerthy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists