linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] ethernet/arc/arc_emac

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4881796E12491D4BB15146FE0209CE643F5F30BF@DE02WEMBXB.internal.synopsys.com>
Date:	Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:16:04 +0000
From:	Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>
To:	Florian Fainelli <florian@...nwrt.org>
CC:	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>,
	Mischa Jonker <Mischa.Jonker@...opsys.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	"Paul Gortmaker" <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Devicetree Discuss <devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] ethernet/arc/arc_emac - Add new driver

On 06/20/2013 01:57 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 2013/6/20 Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>:
> [snip]
>
>>
>> In general MDIO register gets polled by "libphy" once in a couple of
>> seconds, so delay of 25 milliseconds IMHO is fine.
>>
>>>> +int arc_mdio_probe(struct device_node *dev_node, struct arc_emac_priv *priv)
>>>> +{
>>>
>>>> +       snprintf(bus->id, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE, "%.8x", (unsigned int)priv->regs);
>>>
>>> Is bus->id exposed to user-space somehow?
>>
>> Well as a boot-up message from "libphy":
>> ====
>> libphy: Synopsys MII Bus: probed
>> ====
>
> Well not only as a boot-up message, this serves as unique identifer in
> the entire system for your MDIO bus. It is crucial that you have an
> unique MDIO bus identifier for at least the two following reasons:
>
> - the corresponding kobject/sysfs node that is going to be created
> also needs to be unique in the system
> - you may have multiple MDIO bus in the system (e.g: the one for your
> specific driver and the fixed MDIO bus)

Good explanation. I didn't realize it yet.
And it seems like I talked about bus "name", not "id".

> Since you are using Device Tree already, you may just turn this into:
>
> snprintf(bus->id, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE, "%s", pdev->name);
>
> assuming that your node is already properly labelleled (e.g:
> mdio@...dbeef) which would be exactly equivalent to what you are doing
> with priv->regs;

The thing is I don't have separate "mdio" device description in DT.
Regs value is read from "ethernet" device description.

Here's my DT entry for entire emac:
=============
		ethernet@...c2000 {
			compatible = "snps,arc-emac";
			reg = <0xc0fc2000 0x3c>;
			interrupts = <6>;
			mac-address = [ 00 11 22 33 44 55 ];
			clock-frequency = <80000000>;
			max-speed = <100>;
			phy = <&phy0>;

			#address-cells = <1>;
			#size-cells = <0>;
			phy0: ethernet-phy@0 {
				reg = <1>;
			};
		};
=============

So with your proposal bus id will be just "ethernet" which is not that 
unique, right?

That's why address of registers IMHO fits better to a bus id.

-Alexey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/