linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: fix trigger_all_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130620120055.GC12479@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:00:55 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() implementation


* Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com> wrote:

> The following change fixes the x86 implementation of
> trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(), which was previously (accidentally, as
> far as I can tell) disabled to always return false as on architectures
> that do not implement this function.
> 
> Is there any chance that we could get this in before v3.10 ?

Looks good at first glance - I'll test it and push Linuswards.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/