[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130620022837.GA20609@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:28:37 -0700
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
Cc: Runzhen Wang <runzhen@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
paulus@...ba.org, acme@...hat.com,
xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, icycoder@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf tools: fix a typo of a Power7 event name
Michael Ellerman [michael@...erman.id.au] wrote:
| On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 17:15 +0800, Runzhen Wang wrote:
| > In the Power7 PMU guide:
| > https://www.power.org/documentation/commonly-used-metrics-for-performance-analysis/
| > PM_BRU_MPRED is referred to as PM_BR_MPRED.
| >
| > This patch fix the typo by changing the name of the event in kernel and
| > documentation accordingly.
| >
| > Signed-off-by: Runzhen Wang <runzhen@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
| > ---
| > .../testing/sysfs-bus-event_source-devices-events | 2 +-
| > arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c | 12 ++++++------
| > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
| >
| > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-event_source-devices-events b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-event_source-devices-events
| > index 8b25ffb..3c1cc24 100644
| > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-event_source-devices-events
| > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-event_source-devices-events
| > @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ Description: Generic performance monitoring events
| >
| > What: /sys/devices/cpu/events/PM_1PLUS_PPC_CMPL
| > /sys/devices/cpu/events/PM_BRU_FIN
| > - /sys/devices/cpu/events/PM_BRU_MPRED
| > + /sys/devices/cpu/events/PM_BR_MPRED
|
| So you're changing the ABI.
|
| I think that's probably OK, but you at least need to mention _why_ you
| think it's OK.
Some of the reasons I think its ok to change:
- It is relatively new interface, specific to the Power7 platform.
- No tools that we know of actually use this interface at this point (none
are listed near the interface).
- Users of this interface (eg oprofile users migrating to perf) would be
more used to the "PM_BR_MPRED" rather than "PM_BRU_MPRED".
- These are in the ABI/testing at this point rather than ABI/stable, so
hoping we have some wiggle room.
But of course this is not a "grave error" or "security hole" which are
the justifications listed in the Documentation/ABI/README. If these
are not good enough reasons, we can leave the misnomer around and
create another file in sysfs with the correct name PM_BR_MPRED.
Sukadev
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists