linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 2/4] tracing/kprobes: Kill probe_enable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130620173809.GA13158@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 20 Jun 2013 19:38:09 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"zhangwei(Jovi)" <jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] tracing/kprobes: Kill probe_enable_lock

enable_trace_probe() and disable_trace_probe() should not worry about
serialization, the caller (perf_trace_init or __ftrace_set_clr_event)
holds event_mutex.

They are also called by kprobe_trace_self_tests_init(), but this __init
function can't race with itself or trace_events.c

And note that this code depended on event_mutex even before 41a7dd420c
which introduced probe_enable_lock. In fact it assumes that the caller
kprobe_register() can never race with itself. Otherwise, say, tp->flags
manipulations are racy.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c |   43 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
index c0af476..3432652 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
@@ -183,16 +183,15 @@ static struct trace_probe *find_trace_probe(const char *event,
 	return NULL;
 }
 
+/*
+ * This and enable_trace_probe/disable_trace_probe rely on event_mutex
+ * held by the caller, __ftrace_set_clr_event().
+ */
 static int trace_probe_nr_files(struct trace_probe *tp)
 {
-	struct ftrace_event_file **file;
+	struct ftrace_event_file **file = rcu_dereference_raw(tp->files);
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	/*
-	 * Since all tp->files updater is protected by probe_enable_lock,
-	 * we don't need to lock an rcu_read_lock.
-	 */
-	file = rcu_dereference_raw(tp->files);
 	if (file)
 		while (*(file++))
 			ret++;
@@ -200,8 +199,6 @@ static int trace_probe_nr_files(struct trace_probe *tp)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(probe_enable_lock);
-
 /*
  * Enable trace_probe
  * if the file is NULL, enable "perf" handler, or enable "trace" handler.
@@ -211,8 +208,6 @@ enable_trace_probe(struct trace_probe *tp, struct ftrace_event_file *file)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	mutex_lock(&probe_enable_lock);
-
 	if (file) {
 		struct ftrace_event_file **new, **old;
 		int n = trace_probe_nr_files(tp);
@@ -223,7 +218,7 @@ enable_trace_probe(struct trace_probe *tp, struct ftrace_event_file *file)
 			      GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!new) {
 			ret = -ENOMEM;
-			goto out_unlock;
+			goto out;
 		}
 		memcpy(new, old, n * sizeof(struct ftrace_event_file *));
 		new[n] = file;
@@ -247,10 +242,7 @@ enable_trace_probe(struct trace_probe *tp, struct ftrace_event_file *file)
 		else
 			ret = enable_kprobe(&tp->rp.kp);
 	}
-
- out_unlock:
-	mutex_unlock(&probe_enable_lock);
-
+ out:
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -283,8 +275,6 @@ disable_trace_probe(struct trace_probe *tp, struct ftrace_event_file *file)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	mutex_lock(&probe_enable_lock);
-
 	if (file) {
 		struct ftrace_event_file **new, **old;
 		int n = trace_probe_nr_files(tp);
@@ -293,7 +283,7 @@ disable_trace_probe(struct trace_probe *tp, struct ftrace_event_file *file)
 		old = rcu_dereference_raw(tp->files);
 		if (n == 0 || trace_probe_file_index(tp, file) < 0) {
 			ret = -EINVAL;
-			goto out_unlock;
+			goto out;
 		}
 
 		if (n == 1) {	/* Remove the last file */
@@ -304,7 +294,7 @@ disable_trace_probe(struct trace_probe *tp, struct ftrace_event_file *file)
 				      GFP_KERNEL);
 			if (!new) {
 				ret = -ENOMEM;
-				goto out_unlock;
+				goto out;
 			}
 
 			/* This copy & check loop copies the NULL stopper too */
@@ -327,10 +317,7 @@ disable_trace_probe(struct trace_probe *tp, struct ftrace_event_file *file)
 		else
 			disable_kprobe(&tp->rp.kp);
 	}
-
- out_unlock:
-	mutex_unlock(&probe_enable_lock);
-
+ out:
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -1215,6 +1202,12 @@ kretprobe_perf_func(struct trace_probe *tp, struct kretprobe_instance *ri,
 }
 #endif	/* CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS */
 
+/*
+ * called by perf_trace_init() or __ftrace_set_clr_event() under event_mutex.
+ *
+ * kprobe_trace_self_tests_init() does enable_trace_probe/disable_trace_probe
+ * lockless, but we can't race with this __init function.
+ */
 static __kprobes
 int kprobe_register(struct ftrace_event_call *event,
 		    enum trace_reg type, void *data)
@@ -1380,6 +1373,10 @@ find_trace_probe_file(struct trace_probe *tp, struct trace_array *tr)
 	return NULL;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Nobody but us can call enable_trace_probe/disable_trace_probe at this
+ * stage, we can do this lockless.
+ */
 static __init int kprobe_trace_self_tests_init(void)
 {
 	int ret, warn = 0;
-- 
1.5.5.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/