[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130620181015.GA27833@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 19:10:15 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux EFI <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 0/4] EFI 1:1 mapping
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 08:08:08PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 06:12:10PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 07:01:24PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >
> > > If we can detect the Macs, we can make this decision automatic. And
> > > since no Mac boots windoze, a single DMI check of the sort "if (Mac)"
> > > should suffice.
> >
> > Yes, we can special-case Macs. But since our behaviour is then obviously
> > different to Windows, we'll inevitably break some other system.
>
> Why different? We'll have the high mappings and shove the 1:1 mappings
> down SetVirtualAddressMap by default.
Because Windows passes high addresses to SetVirtualAddressMap(), and
because if you can imagine firmware developers getting it wrong then
firmware developers will have got it wrong.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists