linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: just chaeking correctness of the infiniband tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAG4TOxNp0h5i2tGwYxVQeV8Yk=QrvtCAp-xTxRfF2-Am44tJ9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 20 Jun 2013 22:51:47 -0700
From:	Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: just chaeking correctness of the infiniband tree

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> I noticed that the infiniband tree is now based on the net-next tree.  I
> assume that is deliberate?  I do have to question how much testing that
> tree has had since it is now based on a tree that Dave only released in
> the last 24 hours ...

That is intentional since there is work coming that relies on net-next
prerequisites.

The tree hasn't had much testing, but pushing it out a few weeks
before the merge window is the way it gets testing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/