lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51C3F9DD.5040709@overkiz.com>
Date:	Fri, 21 Jun 2013 08:59:41 +0200
From:	boris brezillon <b.brezillon@...rkiz.com>
To:	"Yang, Wenyou" <Wenyou.Yang@...el.com>
CC:	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	"Ferre, Nicolas" <Nicolas.FERRE@...el.com>,
	"linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org" 
	<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: handle already configured
 wdt

On 21/06/2013 03:47, Yang, Wenyou wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: linux-arm-kernel [mailto:linux-arm-kernel-bounces@...ts.infradead.org]
>> On Behalf Of Boris BREZILLON
>> Sent: 2013年6月11日 18:51
>> To: Wim Van Sebroeck; Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard; Ferre, Nicolas;
>> linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org; linux-doc@...r.kernel.org;
>> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; Boris
>> BREZILLON
>> Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/4] watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: handle already configured
>> wdt
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> This patch series is a porposal to enhance the sam9 watchdog timer support.
>>
>> The at91sam9 watchdog timer cannot configured twice, and the current
>> implementation only tries to configure in a static way:
>> - 2 seconds timeout
>> - wdt restart every 500ms
>>
>> If the timer has already been configured with different values, it returns an
>> error and do not create any watchdog device.
>>
>> This is not critical if the watchdog is disabled, but if it has been enabled with
>> different timeout values it will lead to a SoC reset.
>>
>> This patch series tries to address this issue by adapting the heartbeat value
>> according the WDT timer config:
>> - it first tries to configure the timer as requested.
>> - if it fails it fallbacks to the current config, adapting its heartbeat timer
>> to the needs
>>
>> This patch series also move to a dynamically allocated at91wdt device instead
>> of the static instance. I'm not sure this is the best solution, so please tell
>> me if you prefer to keep static instance of watchdog.
>>
>> It adds a new at91 wdt type: software. This new type make use of the at91 wdt
>> interrupt to trigger a software watchdog.
>>
>> Finally it adds several properties to the device tree bindings.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Boris
>>
>> Boris BREZILLON (4):
>>   watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: better watchdog support
>>   watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: update device tree doc
>>   ARM: at91/dt: add sam9 watchdog default options to SoCs
>>   ARM: at91/dt: add watchdog properties to kizbox board
>>
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/watchdog/atmel-wdt.txt     |   30 +-
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9260.dtsi                 |    5 +
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9263.dtsi                 |    5 +
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g45.dtsi                 |    5 +
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9n12.dtsi                 |    5 +
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi                  |    5 +
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/kizbox.dts                       |    6 +
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3.dtsi                     |    5 +
>>  drivers/watchdog/at91sam9_wdt.c                    |  319
>> +++++++++++++++-----
>>  9 files changed, 300 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
>>
> Tested on sama5d34ek, at91sam9g25ek, linux-next_20130620
>
> Tested by Wenyou Yang <Wenyou.yang@...el.com>
>
Thanks for your tests and review.

Best Regards,

Boris
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ