[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKYAXd8RQvY+-xRam2yymERAAf8oUEJ0Rznaev_ixy+xR=Ecrg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:30:16 +0900
From: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
To: Changman Lee <cm224.lee@...sung.com>
Cc: jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com, Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>,
Pankaj Kumar <pankaj.km@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: reorganize the f2fs_setattr() function.
>
> Sorry for late. I was very busy.
>
> Could you tell me if it happens difference between xattr and i_mode,
> what will you do?
First of all, I want to know which case make mismatching permission
between xattr and i_mode.
And when we call chmod, inode is locked in sys_chmod. If so,
inode->i_mode can be changed by any updated inode during chmod
although inode is locked ?
> The purpose of i_acl_mode is used to update i_mode and xattr together in
> same lock region.
Could you please tell me what is same lock region ? (inode->i_mutex or
mutex_lock_op(sbi))
Thanks.
>
>>
>> >
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Subject: [PATCH v2] f2fs: reorganize the f2fs_setattr(), f2fs_set_acl,
>> > f2fs_setxattr()
>> > From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
>> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists