[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201306210936.09593.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:36:09 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>,
Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.ramirez@...itl.com>,
Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@...com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the mailbox tree
On Friday 21 June 2013, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > I wonder if this mess is caused by the fact that I did the revert
> > instead of rebuilding our for-next and dropping the merge in the first
> > place.
> >
> > I'll rebuild our for-next (or maybe Arnd will beat me to it) before
> > next linux-next build, i.e. Sunday night my time.
>
> Could be, especially if some of the commits are the same in the reverted
> branch and newly merged branch as git might think that some merges have
> been already resolved the right way earlier.
I already rebuilt the arm-soc tree before Stephen started with today's
linux-next, so I think the conflict is elsewhere.
It's probably best if Suman Anna rebases the mailbox tree on top of
the omap mailbox branch that I took.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists