linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] time: add a notifier chain for when the system time is stepped

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:57:10 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
cc:	xen-devel@...ts.xen.org,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] time: add a notifier chain for when the system time
 is stepped

On Thu, 20 Jun 2013, David Vrabel wrote:

> From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
> 
> The high resolution timer code gets notified of step changes to the
> system time with clock_was_set() or clock_was_set_delayed() calls.  If
> other parts of the kernel require similar notification there is no
> clear place to hook into.

You fail to explain why any other part of the kernel requires a
notification.
 
We went great length to confine timekeeping inside the core code and
now you add random notifiers along with totally ugly tasklet
constructs. What for?

Without a reasonable explanation of the problem you are trying to
solve this is going nowhere near the tree.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/