[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201306211030.47440.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:30:47 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
"'Kukjin Kim'" <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
"'Bjorn Helgaas'" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"'Grant Likely'" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
"'Andrew Murray'" <andrew.murray@....com>,
"'Thierry Reding'" <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
"'Jason Gunthorpe'" <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
"'Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla'" <suren.reddy@...sung.com>,
"'Siva Reddy Kallam'" <siva.kallam@...sung.com>,
"'Thomas Abraham'" <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>,
"'Tomasz Figa'" <t.figa@...sung.com>,
"'Pratyush Anand'" <pratyush.anand@...com>,
"'Mohit KUMAR'" <Mohit.KUMAR@...com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V10 0/4] PCIe support for Samsung Exynos5440 SoC
On Friday 21 June 2013, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> I am by far not an expert on how to solve merge strategies and so on,
> but to avoid conflicts at Linus's level while merging the arm-soc and
> pci trees, it would be better if this Samsung PCIe driver could go
> through arm-soc (with Bjorn ACK, of course), so that Arnd/Olof can
> make sure the ordering is correct with regard to the of/pci changes and
> the mvebu/pci driver.
Yes, good point.
The alternative would be that Bjorn also takes the PCI branch dependencies
that are already in arm-soc into his tree. Either way works, but I agree
that what you suggest would be simpler.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists