[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51C45A3F.7000009@st.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 14:50:55 +0100
From: Srinivas KANDAGATLA <srinivas.kandagatla@...com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>, kernel@...inux.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Stephen Gallimore <stephen.gallimore@...com>,
Stuart Menefy <stuart.menefy@...com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/10] serial:st-asc: Add ST ASC driver.
Hi Greg,
If its not too late can this patch be considered for 3.11 via tty tree?
Arnd preferred to take the SOC patches in this series via arm-soc tree.
Also, there is no build dependency for this patch.
Thanks,
srini
On 20/06/13 20:01, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 20 June 2013, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote:
>> This patch adds support to ASC (asynchronous serial controller)
>> driver, which is basically a standard serial driver. This IP is common
>> across all the ST parts for settop box platforms.
>>
>> ASC is embedded in ST COMMS IP block. It supports Rx & Tx functionality.
>> It support all industry standard baud rates.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...com>
>> CC: Stephen Gallimore <stephen.gallimore@...com>
>> CC: Stuart Menefy <stuart.menefy@...com>
>> CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>> CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>
>>>From my point of view the series is ready for merging in 3.11,
> I only had a few final comments. I would prefer the first three
> patches to go through the respective serial/clocksource/pinctrl
> trees, since there are no direct build dependencies to the
> platform parts.
>
> If there is a reason to take those through arm-soc, I would
> insist on getting Acked-by's from the subsystem maintainers.
>
> Arnd
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists