[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130621101600.e9cff446d5f6e21c3e8599c8@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:16:00 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>
Cc: Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the leds tree
Hi Guys,
On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 10:26:31 +0400 Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru> wrote:
>
> > After merging the leds tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/leds/leds-mc13783.c: In function 'mc13xxx_led_probe':
> > drivers/leds/leds-mc13783.c:280:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_get_next_child' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > child = of_get_next_child(parent, child);
> > ^
> >
> > Caused by commit 2ca3a455432f ("leds: leds-mc13783: Add devicetree support"). of_get_next_child() is only defined if CONFIG_OF is set.
> >
> > I have used the version of the leds tree from next-20130607 for today.
>
> The patch has already been sent by me.
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-leds/msg00994.html
I anything happening about this? That patch would need to go into the
leds tree (with acks from devicetree people - Grant cc'd).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists