lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:16:00 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>
Cc:	Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the leds tree

Hi Guys,

On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 10:26:31 +0400 Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru> wrote:
>
> > After merging the leds tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> > 
> > drivers/leds/leds-mc13783.c: In function 'mc13xxx_led_probe':
> > drivers/leds/leds-mc13783.c:280:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_get_next_child' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >     child = of_get_next_child(parent, child);
> >     ^
> > 
> > Caused by commit 2ca3a455432f ("leds: leds-mc13783: Add devicetree support").  of_get_next_child() is only defined if CONFIG_OF is set.
> > 
> > I have used the version of the leds tree from next-20130607 for today.
> 
> The patch has already been sent by me.
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-leds/msg00994.html

I anything happening about this?  That patch would need to go into the
leds tree (with acks from devicetree people - Grant cc'd).
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists