[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQX3Opcv0E7+PXNAUoJtgoa0Cxv5wOK=R_ERvQjN79poXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:44:22 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>, Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
Mike Travis <travis@....com>, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] Delay initializing of large sections of memory
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:03 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 06/21/2013 09:51 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>
> I suspect the cutoff for this should be a lot lower than 8 TB even, more
> like 128 GB or so. The only concern is to not set the cutoff so low
> that we can end up running out of memory or with suboptimal NUMA
> placement just because of this.
I would suggest another way:
only boot the system with boot node (include cpu, ram and pci root buses).
then after boot, could add other nodes.
or something like pxm_mask or node_mask to select boot nodes.
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists