[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1306220110110.4013@ionos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 01:13:46 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3/RESEND 4/4] clocksource: arch_timer: Add support for
memory mapped timers
On Fri, 21 Jun 2013, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 06/21/13 14:18, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Something in my little brain yells: function pointer
> >
> > You can't be serious about hacking nested if/else/switch constructs
> > into a hot path.
> >
> > Why not making your cpu data:
> >
> > struct arch_timer {
> > struct clock_event_device evt;
> > ....
> > void (*write_ctrl)(val, timer);
> > void (*write_tval)(val, timer);
> > ....
> > }
> >
> > and get rid of all that conditionals?
>
> It sounds like that's undesirable according to the comment above
> arch_timer_reg_write(). It seems that all this code was written under
> the assumption that the compiler is good enough to optimize all the code
> paths and only generate the code that is necessary. So far this seems to
> be working and the hotpath is optimized for each type of access.
That might be true for kernels which are optimized for a specific
target, but this will fall flat for any multi-platform kernel.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists