[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130623093250.GA13776@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 11:32:50 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>
Cc: holt@....com, travis@....com, rob@...dley.net, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, yinghai@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] x86_64, mm: Reinsert the absent memory
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> Yet another thing to consider would be to implement an initialization
> speedup of 3 orders of magnitude: initialize on the large page (2MB)
> grandularity and on-demand delay the initialization of the 4K granular
> struct pages [but still allocating them] - which I suspect are a good
> chunk of the overhead? That way we could initialize in 2MB steps and speed
> up the 2 hours bootup of 32 TB of RAM to 14 seconds...
>
> [ The cost would be one more branch in the buddy allocator, to detect
> not-yet-initialized 2 MB chunks as we encounter them. Acceptable I
> think. ]
One advantage of this scheme would be that we could use it on pretty much
any box, it would provide instant boot time speedups everywhere [a couple
of hundred msecs on a small 4GB box - significant I think] - and would
spread out and parallelize initialization to later stages.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists