[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1371981811.3137.25.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 03:03:31 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>, pavel@....cz,
len.brown@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
shuahkhan@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv v3] power: Include additional information in
pm_print_times
On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 12:07 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, June 22, 2013 06:05:50 PM Joe Perches wrote:
> > If any script needs something stable it should
> > depend on information available through other
> > sources like trace or proc or sysfs.
>
> That is clearly impossible in this particular case, though.
Why couldn't this printk be converted into an equivalent tracepoint?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists