linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv v3] power: Include additional information in pm_print

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 23 Jun 2013 13:24:01 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>, pavel@....cz,
	len.brown@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	shuahkhan@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv v3] power: Include additional information in pm_print_times

On Sunday, June 23, 2013 03:41:20 AM Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 12:35 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Sunday, June 23, 2013 03:16:30 AM Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 12:22 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, June 23, 2013 03:03:31 AM Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 12:07 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > > On Saturday, June 22, 2013 06:05:50 PM Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > > > > If any script needs something stable it should
> > > > > > > depend on information available through other
> > > > > > > sources like trace or proc or sysfs.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > That is clearly impossible in this particular case, though.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Why couldn't this printk be converted into an equivalent tracepoint?
> > > > 
> > > > Well, why wouldn't you try to do that?
> > > 
> > > Why should I?
> >
> > Because you're arguing that it should be done.
> >
> > If you think that it's better to use tracepoints here, please implement those
> > tracepoints and show everyone that they are really better than what we have.
> 
> Nope, you're arguing that dmesg output, known to be non-stable,
> should not have this particular message changed.
> 
> You stated "<it's> clearly impossible".  I do dispute that.

And what I meant by that was "there are no tracepoints, sysfs attributes etc.
those tools can use to get the information they need".  Which is a fact of
life.

> If you need something stable, you shouldn't use dmesg,
> That's a simple statement, not anything else.
> 
> Right now, I don't care if this particular message changes.
> I'm not doing any PM testing or timing at the moment.
> 
> > Till then, we'll use what's already there.
> 
> Fine by me.  It's up to Shuah Khan to get a patch accepted.

Well, precisely.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/