[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130623124316.GA3025@katana>
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 14:43:18 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Bin Gao <bin_gao@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Bin Gao <bin.gao@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: i2c: introduce i2c helper i2c_find_client_by_name()
> >I also wonder about the need to unregister. I have to admit I don't know
> >much about I2C handling in v4l2. But if it requires unregistering from
> >i2c core and registering to v4l2 core, then it sounds to me like we
> >could check if there is a more fundamential cleanup needed? Deferring
> >for now, looks like an issue worth looking at, yet there are other
> >things in the queue first.
> >
>
> Platform codes are supposed to call i2c_register_board_info() or
> i2c_new_device() to register devices, we don't want to change this.
Exactly.
> Not sure v4l2 can still take over the devices without
> unregistering/registering. Need look deeply into the v4l2 code...
That would help, I currently don't have time for that.
Thanks,
Wolfram
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists