[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130624084744.GA23779@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 09:47:44 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
"olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: arm64: kernel: add '#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT' for
aarch32_break_handler()
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 06:54:14AM +0100, Chen Gang wrote:
>
> If 'COMPAT' not defined, aarch32_break_handler() cannot pass compiling,
> so need add '#ifdef' for it just like the header file has done.
>
> The related make:
>
> make ARCH=arm64 randconfig
> make ARCH=arm64 menuconfig
> make ARCH=arm64 V=1 EXTRA_CFLAGS=-W
>
> The related error:
>
> arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c:249:5: error: redefinition of ‘aarch32_break_handler’
> In file included from arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c:29:0:
> /root/linux-next/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h:89:12: note: previous definition of ‘aarch32_break_handler’ was here
Actually, can we just kill the static definition in debug-monitors.h
instead? I don't see anything in the full-blown aardch32_break_handler that
won't play nicely if !COMPAT.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists