lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19900521.4upM9YL2PZ@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Mon, 24 Jun 2013 13:58:43 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robin.randhawa@....com,
	Steve.Bannister@....com, Liviu.Dudau@....com,
	charles.garcia-tobin@....com, arvind.chauhan@....com,
	dave.martin@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] CPUFreq: Fix {PRE|POST}CHANGE notification sequence

On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 02:22:54 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> PRECHANGE and POSTCHANGE notifiers must be called in groups, i.e either both
> should be called or both shouldn't be.
> 
> In case we have started PRECHANGE notifier and found an error, we must call
> POSTCHANGE notifier with freqs.new = freqs.old to guarantee that sequence of
> calling notifiers is complete.
> 
> This isn't obeyed by many of the drivers and core wasn't forcing it.
> 
> This patchset first fixes all the driver to follow it strictly and then adds
> some protection against this. Now, we keep track of the last transaction and see
> if something went wrong.
> 
> Last patch is intentionally kept towards the end, so that git bisect still works
> well for all the faulty drivers.
> 
> This is pushed here and a pull request for 3.11 would be sent after few days.
> 
> git://git.linaro.org/people/vireshk/linux.git cpufreq-fix-notification
> 
> Viresh Kumar (13):
>   cpufreq: acpi: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
>   cpufreq: arm-big-little: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error
>     cases
>   cpufreq: davinci: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
>   cpufreq: dbx500: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
>   cpufreq: e_powersave: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
>   cpufreq: exynos: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
>   cpufreq: imx6q: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
>   cpufreq: omap: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
>   cpufreq: pcc: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
>   cpufreq: powernow-k8: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
>   cpufreq: s3c64xx: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
>   cpufreq: tegra: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
>   cpufreq: make sure frequency transitions are serialized

Patches [1,5,9-10/13] applied to bleeding-edge, the ARM ones I'm expecting
to get from you and [13/13] can wait.

Thanks,
Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ