[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51C8627A.5000106@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 11:15:06 -0400
From: Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Add support for LPAE style CONTEXTIDR
On 06/24/2013 10:53 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 03:39:09PM +0100, Christopher Covington wrote:
>> Hi Will,
>>
>> On 06/24/2013 10:04 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>> What's the advantage of this approach, other than you get an extra byte's
>>> worth of PID?
>>
>> In my view, the real advantage is that the the PID is located where people
>> reading ARM Architecture Reference Manual are told they can find it.
>
> Perhaps, but I'd usually expect a debugger or trace tools to do something
> with the PID, and they likely expect it to be shifted, so you can't really
> win.
But reading and implementing the architecture *is* winning! LOL. I'll file a
ticket with the architecture folks and see what they think.
Christopher
--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by the Linux Foundation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists