[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51C86524.8020708@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 09:26:28 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: rip out the direct pinconf API
On 06/24/2013 07:15 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>
> From the inception ot the pin config API there has been the
> possibility to get a handle at a pin directly and configure
> its electrical characteristics. For this reason we had:
>
> int pin_config_get(const char *dev_name, const char *name,
> unsigned long *config);
> int pin_config_set(const char *dev_name, const char *name,
> unsigned long config);
> int pin_config_group_get(const char *dev_name,
> const char *pin_group,
> unsigned long *config);
> int pin_config_group_set(const char *dev_name,
> const char *pin_group,
> unsigned long config);
>
> After the intruction of the pin control states that will
> control pins associated with devices, and its subsequent
> introduction to the device core, as well as the
> introduction of pin control hogs that can set up states on
> boot and optionally also at sleep, this direct pin control
> API is a thing of the past.
>
> As could be expected, it has zero in-kernel users.
> Let's delete this API and make our world simpler.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists