[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51C87477.9020505@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 12:31:51 -0400
From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>
To: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
CC: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"Chandramouleeswaran, Aswin" <aswin@...com>,
"Norton, Scott J" <scott.norton@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] Lockless update of reference count protected
by spinlock
On 06/19/2013 12:50 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
> This patchset supports a generic mechanism to atomically update
> a reference count that is protected by a spinlock without actually
> acquiring the lock itself. If the update doesn't succeeed, the caller
> will have to acquire the lock and update the reference count in the
> the old way. This will help in situation where there is a lot of
> spinlock contention because of frequent reference count update.
>
> The new mechanism was designed in such a way to easily retrofit
> into existing code with minimal changes. Both the spinlock and the
> reference count can be accessed in the same way as before.
>
> The d_lock and d_count fields of the struct dentry in dcache.h was
> modified to use the new mechanism. This serves as an example of how
> to convert existing spinlock and reference count combo to use the
> new way of locklessly updating the reference count.
>
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long<Waiman.Long@...com>
>
> Waiman Long (2):
> spinlock: New spinlock_refcount.h for lockless update of refcount
> dcache: Locklessly update d_count whenever possible
>
> fs/dcache.c | 14 +++-
> include/linux/dcache.h | 22 +++++-
> include/linux/spinlock_refcount.h | 145 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/spinlock_types.h | 19 +++++
> 4 files changed, 196 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 include/linux/spinlock_refcount.h
>
So far, I haven't received any feedback on this patch. I would really
appreciate if someone could let me know if there is any improvement that
will make this patch more merge-able.
Thanks,
Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists