linux-kernel - Re: frequent softlockups with 3.10rc6.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130624164918.GA8572@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 24 Jun 2013 12:49:18 -0400
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: frequent softlockups with 3.10rc6.

On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 06:37:08PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
 > On 06/24, Dave Jones wrote:
 > >
 > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:52:29AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
 > >
 > >  > > >  check_list_nodes corruption. next->prev should be prev (ffff88023b8a1a08), but was 00ffff88023b8a1a. (next=ffff880243288001).
 > >  > >
 > >  > > Can't find "check_list_nodes" in lib/list_debug.c or elsewhere...
 > >  > >
 > >  > > >   [<ffffffff816e467d>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
 > >  > > >   [<ffffffff8104a0c1>] warn_slowpath_common+0x61/0x80
 > >  > > >   [<ffffffff8104a12c>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4c/0x50
 > >  > > >   [<ffffffff81112c61>] rb_head_page_deactivate.isra.39+0x61/0x80
 > >  > >
 > >  > > How? rb_list_head_clear() just modifies list->next directly.
 > >  > >
 > >  > > > hopefully despite that it'll actually function as intended.
 > >  > >
 > >  > > Yes ;)
 > >  >
 > >  > I'm curious to what happened.
 > >
 > > Ah, this is the first victim of my new 'check sanity of nodes during list walks' patch.
 > > It's doing the same prev->next next->prev checking as list_add and friends.
 > > I'm looking at getting it into shape for a 3.12 merge after some other preparatory patches
 > > go into 3.11
 > 
 > So you used the patched kernel when you hit the lockups ?
 > 
 > What else was changed?

I hit the lockups on the vanilla tree too.

	Dave




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/