[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130624170856.GA475@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 19:08:56 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] epoll_wait: fix EINTR leak
On 06/24, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>
> Usage of EINTR is wrong.
I agree, this is not nice. However "fix EINTR leak" doesn't look
accurate, -EINTR is fine as an error code. Just the syscall should
restart if possible.
> --- a/fs/eventpoll.c
> +++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
> @@ -1598,7 +1598,7 @@ fetch_events:
> if (ep_events_available(ep) || timed_out)
> break;
> if (signal_pending(current)) {
> - res = -EINTR;
> + res = -ERESTARTNOHAND;
This and other similar changes do look right.
Say, sys_epoll_wait(). With this patch it can sleep, then return
ERESTARTNOHAND.
And we restart it with the same timeout again. If you want to
make it restartable, you need ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK and
do_restart_epoll_wait() which we do not have.
See for example sys_poll() which implements this logic.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists