[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zjuftmu8.fsf@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 10:55:43 -0700
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Hebbar Gururaja <gururaja.hebbar@...com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: add pinctrl handling
Hi Grygorii,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com> writes:
> Before switching to DT pinctrl states of OMAP IPs have been handled by hwmod
> framework. After switching to DT-boot the pinctrl handling was dropped from
> hwmod framework and, as it was recommended, OMAP IP's drivers have to be updated
> to handle pinctrl states by itself using pinctrl_pm_select_xx() helpers
> (see http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-June/173514.html)
>
> But this is not right for OMAP2+ SoC where real IPs state is controlled
> by omap_device core which enables/disables modules & clocks actually.
>
> For example, if OMAP I2C driver will handle pinctrl state during system wide
> suspend the following issue may occure:
> - suspend_noirq - I2C device can be still active because of PM auto-suspend
> |-_od_suspend_noirq
> |- omap_i2c_suspend_noirq
> |- PINs state set to SLEEP
> |- pm_generic_runtime_suspend
> |- omap_i2c_runtime_suspend()
> |- PINs state set to IDLE <--- *oops* PINs state is IDLE and not SLEEP
> |- omap_device_idle()
> |- omap_hwmod_idle()
> |- _idle()
> |- disbale module (sysc&clocks)
>
> - resume_noirq - I2C was active before suspend
> |-_od_resume_noirq
> |- omap_hwmod_enable()
> |- _enable()
> |- enable module (sysc&clocks)
> |- pm_generic_runtime_resume
> |- omap_i2c_runtime_resume()
> |- PINs state set to DEFAULT <--- !!!!
> |- omap_i2c_resume_noirq
> |- PINs state set to DEFAULT
> |- PINs state set to IDLE <--- *big oops* we have active module and its
> PINs state is IDLE
> (see https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2642101/)
>
> Of course, everything can be handled by adding a tons of code in ecah driver to
> check PM state of device and override default behavior of omap_device core, but
> this not good.
>
> Hence, add pinctrl handling in omap_device core:
> 1) on PM runtime resume
> - switch pinctrl state to "default" (todo: "active")
> 2) on PM runtime suspend
> - switch pinctrl state to "idle"
> 3) during system wide suspend
> - switch pinctrl state to "sleep" or "idle" if omap_device core disables device
> - switch pinctrl state to "sleep" if device is disabled already
> 4) during system wide resume
> - switch pinctrl state to "default" (todo: "active") if omap_device core has
> disabled device during suspend
> - switch pinctrl state to "idle" if device was already disabled before suspend
>
> This will enable pinctrl for all OMAP2+ IP's drivers by default -
> no changes in code is needed and only DT data will need to be updated
> (add "default", "active", "idle", "sleep" states).
>
> This will enable pinctrl handling for all OMAP2+ drivers by default -
> no changes in code is needed and only DT data will need to be updated
> (add "default", "active", "idle", "sleep" states).
>
> Related discussions:
> - [3/3] i2c: nomadik: use pinctrl PM helpers
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2670291/
> - mmc: omap_hsmmc: Remux pins to support SDIO interrupt and PM runtime
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2690191/
> - [PATCH 00/11] drivers: Add Pinctrl PM support
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/31/210
>
> CC: Hebbar Gururaja <gururaja.hebbar@...com>
> CC: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> CC: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> CC: linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
> ---
> Hi Kevin, Tony,
>
> I've verified this patch on OMAP4 SDP board:
> - PM runtime for I2C4, UART2, UART3
> - suspend/resume with I2C4, UART2, UART3
>
> seems it works and pinctrl states have been updated as expected.
Thanks for working on this.
I agree with the approach, and much prefer this to boiler plate code
throughout the drivers.
I suggest we wait until the dust settles on the active/default thread
before taking this further, but have no objections to the approach.
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists