linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH for 3.2] memcg: do not trap chargers with full callstack on OOM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130624201345.GA21822@cmpxchg.org>
Date:	Mon, 24 Jun 2013 16:13:45 -0400
From:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To:	azurIt <azurit@...ox.sk>
Cc:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, cgroups mailinglist <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 3.2] memcg: do not trap chargers with full callstack
 on OOM

Hi guys,

On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 10:09:58PM +0200, azurIt wrote:
> >> But i'm sure of one thing - when problem occurs, nothing is able to
> >> access hard drives (every process which tries it is freezed until
> >> problem is resolved or server is rebooted).
> >
> >I would be really interesting to see what those tasks are blocked on.
> 
> I'm trying to get it, stay tuned :)
> 
> Today i noticed one bug, not 100% sure it is related to 'your' patch
> but i didn't seen this before. I noticed that i have lots of cgroups
> which cannot be removed - if i do 'rmdir <cgroup_directory>', it
> just hangs and never complete. Even more, it's not possible to
> access the whole cgroup filesystem until i kill that rmdir
> (anything, which tries it, just hangs). All unremoveable cgroups has
> this in 'memory.oom_control': oom_kill_disable 0 under_oom 1

Somebody acquires the OOM wait reference to the memcg and marks it
under oom but then does not call into mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize() to
clean up.  That's why under_oom is set and the rmdir waits for
outstanding references.

> And, yes, 'tasks' file is empty.

It's not a kernel thread that does it because all kernel-context
handle_mm_fault() are annotated properly, which means the task must be
userspace and, since tasks is empty, have exited before synchronizing.

Can you try with the following patch on top?

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index 5db0490..9a0b152 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -846,17 +846,6 @@ static noinline int
 mm_fault_error(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
 	       unsigned long address, unsigned int fault)
 {
-	/*
-	 * Pagefault was interrupted by SIGKILL. We have no reason to
-	 * continue pagefault.
-	 */
-	if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
-		if (!(fault & VM_FAULT_RETRY))
-			up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
-		if (!(error_code & PF_USER))
-			no_context(regs, error_code, address);
-		return 1;
-	}
 	if (!(fault & VM_FAULT_ERROR))
 		return 0;
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/