[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1372107737.7914.27.camel@envy.home>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:02:17 -0700
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
To: zhang.yi20@....com.cn
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
'Ingo Molnar' <mingo@...nel.org>,
'Peter Zijlstra' <peterz@...radead.org>,
'Thomas Gleixner' <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Zhang Yi <wetpzy@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] futex: bugfix for futex-key conflict when futex use
hugepage
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 10:00 +0800, zhang.yi20@....com.cn wrote:
>
> Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com> wrote on 2013/05/16 09:30:31:
>
> >
> > pgoff_t is an unsigned long, and page_to_pfn() returns an unsigned long.
> > Since compound_idx can be assigned from page_to_pfn() and it is added
> > with index in the return value, unsigned long seems like a better choice
> > to me. Is there a specific reason you prefer an int? It might be "fine"
> > but it is likely to raise eyebrows whenever someone read through it.
> >
> No other specific reason. I just think that int is enough.
Hi Yi,
I believe this patch is still pending a final version from you. Mel and
I both asked after the change of compound_idx from int to unsigned long.
While "int" may be adequate, for consistency with the return type
assigned and such, the unsigned long is preferred. Could you respin and
send along the patch so Thomas can pull it in?
Thanks,
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Technical Lead - Linux Kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists