[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130624222642.GA24099@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:26:42 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Samu Onkalo <samu.p.onkalo@...ia.com>,
michael.opdenacker@...e-electrons.com,
gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com,
maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com,
alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] char: misc: assign file->private_data in all cases
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 03:01:05PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> In fa1f68db6ca ("drivers: misc: pass miscdevice pointer via file
> private data"), the misc driver infrastructure was changed to assigned
> file->private_data as a pointer to the 'struct miscdevice' that
> corresponds to the device being opened.
>
> However, this assignment was only done when the misc driver was
> declaring a driver-specific ->open() operation in its
> file_operations. This doesn't make sense, as the driver may not
> necessarily have a custom ->open() operation, and might still be
> interested in having file->private_data properly set for use in its
> ->read() and write() operations.
>
> Therefore, we move the assignment of file->private_data outside of the
> condition that tests whether a driver-specific ->open() operation was
> defined.
Does this solve a problem with an existing misc driver? Or are you just
trying to be "safe" for future, broken, drivers?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists