[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130624074117.GA26766@pd.tnic>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 09:41:17 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc: suravee.suthikulpanit@....com, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
ddutile@...hat.com, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] iommu/amd: IOMMU Error Reporting/Handling/Filtering
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 09:26:48AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 07:36:25PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> > IOW, what specific functionality in EDAC are you actually thinking of?
>
> Okay, my believe until yesterday was that EDAC provides a consistent way
> to report hardware errors to userspace. That seems to be wrong. This in
> mind I think having a trace-point for that makes sense.
>
> But this trace-point must not be specific to a single IOMMU driver, I
> want it generic enough so that it can be used by all common IOMMU
> drivers to report hardware misbehaviors to userspace.
Yep, either that or you define a TRACE_EVENT_CLASS which contains common
error info which all iommu drivers report, and those which want to
report more specific information pertaining only to them, then they need
to define a tracepoint based on the iommu event class.
Check the sources for examples.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists