linux-kernel - Re: [tip:perf/core] perf sort: Separate out memory-specific sort keys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51C8ED28.8010008@lge.com>
Date:	Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:06:48 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC:	mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, paulus@...ba.org,
	eranian@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...hat.com,
	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, namhyung@...nel.org, jolsa@...hat.com,
	dsahern@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:perf/core] perf sort: Separate out memory-specific sort
 keys

2013-06-25 AM 10:02, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> I'm not sure it should move to the common keys as normal perf
>> session won't have those.
>
> Why not? If I enable weight sampling i get weights perfectly
> fine in any session using the right PEBS events.
>
>> I guess you need to set up a couple of
>> TSX-specific sort keys like perf mem, if so what about moving the
>> two weights to your table?
>
> There's no TSX table and no separate perf TSX session.
> It's just some additional attributes.

Okay then, I have no objection for moving them. :)

Thanks,
Namhyung

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/