linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] irqchip: Add support for ARMv7-M's NVIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 25 Jun 2013 14:23:01 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
cc:	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Austin <jonathan.austin@....com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] irqchip: Add support for ARMv7-M's NVIC

On Tue, 25 Jun 2013, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Uwe Kleine-König
> <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> > Hello Thomas, hello Grant,
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:50:35PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> >> This interrupt controller is found on Cortex-M3 and Cortex-M4 machines.
> >>
> >> Support for this controller appeared in Catalin's Cortex tree based on
> >> 2.6.33 but was nearly completely rewritten.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Notes:
> >>     Changes since v3, sent with
> >>     Message-Id: <1366214540-31166-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>:
> >>
> >>      - use generic chip
> >>      - rename nvic_do_IRQ to nvic_handle_irq
> >>
> >>     This depends on the stuff currently in tip/irq/for-arm
> > I see that tip/irq/for-arm went into next via Grant's irqdomain tree. I
> > assume that means the changes go in for 3.11?
> 
> Yes, the plan is to put that branch into v3.11. I don't know if Thomas
> plans to send a separate pull request for the irq/for-arm branch, or
> if he is going to let it go as part of my pull request. I'll work it

irq/for-arm is in irq/core as well. So whoever sends first will merge
it and the later pull request will just contain the same commits.

> out with him when the merge window opens. It would probably be best
> for your patch to be applied on the irq/for-arm branch and pushed
> separately from my irqdomain branch since I don't maintain any of the
> irqchip drivers.

I can take it via tip/irq/core.

Thanks,

	tglx