[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1372167081.18733.194.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:31:21 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: "zhangwei(Jovi)" <jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com" <yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing/kprobes: move free_trace_probe into
unregister_trace_probe
On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 19:10 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2013/06/25 17:15), zhangwei(Jovi) wrote:
> > There have no good reason to call free_trace_probe
> > every time when unregister_trace_probe return 0.
> >
> > Move free_trace_probe into unregister_trace_probe,
> > make code simpler.
>
> Sorry, nack. For the symmetrical coding reason, I don't like
> involving "free" and "alloc" into "unregister"/"register"
> functions. I think those should be just another actions.
I totally agree with Masami here. Please do not add "side effects" to
the unregister function.
Thanks,
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists