[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130625145655.68DCBE0090@blue.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:56:55 +0300 (EEST)
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 27/39] x86-64, mm: proper alignment mappings with
hugepages
Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 05/11/2013 06:23 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > +static inline unsigned long mapping_align_mask(struct address_space *mapping)
> > +{
> > + if (mapping_can_have_hugepages(mapping))
> > + return PAGE_MASK & ~HPAGE_MASK;
> > + return get_align_mask();
> > +}
>
> get_align_mask() appears to be a bit more complicated to me than just a
> plain old mask. Are you sure you don't need to pick up any of its
> behavior for the mapping_can_have_hugepages() case?
get_align_mask() never returns more strict mask then we do in
mapping_can_have_hugepages() case.
I can modify it this way:
unsigned long mask = get_align_mask();
if (mapping_can_have_hugepages(mapping))
mask &= PAGE_MASK & ~HPAGE_MASK;
return mask;
But it looks more confusing for me. What do you think?
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists