[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51C9AFC4.1020305@imgtec.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 15:57:08 +0100
From: James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] pinctrl: remove slew-rate parameter from tz1090
On 25/06/13 14:22, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Can't we just try to come up with a patch that nails down the meaning of
> slew rate in some meaningful manner then?
>
> So according to:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slew_rate
> a proper expression for slew rate would be dV/dt i.e.
> something like microvolts per microsecond (which then just
> becomes volts/second).
>
> What we need to figure out is what range will be applicable within
> reasonable doubt for current scenarios and the next few years.
>
> What are your datasheets specifying here, and what would be
> a proper measure?
My datasheet says:
0: slow (half frequency)
1: fast
I just got a reply back from a hardware engineer, who said that the
relationship with the actual volts/usec will depend on both the drive
strength and the load on the pad, and that a definite answer probably
requires running a simulation.
Cheers
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists